#### Go to HealthTreks Home

Note: Going home clears all of these panels.

#### Synchronize panels by clicking the panel directional buttons found at the top of the panel.

Get
0SR9019- 2007 Replace Hip Joint with Metal Syn Subs, Cem, Open

#### Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Outcome Calculator

Introduction
This tool tracks monitoring and evaluation indicators for outcome uris. Up to 20 new M and E indicators can be added for each outcome. Indicator labels are used to identify the same indicator in different calculators (use WBSs for the labels).

Calculation View Description
Sample health care treatment cost used in a tutorial. v168a

Version: 0.9.8

#### Step 3 of 3. Save

Method 1. Do you wish to save step 2's calculations? These calculations are viewed by opening this particular calculator addin.

#### Step 1

• Step 1. Indicators: Up to 10 indicators can be entered in this step and up to 10 indicators can be included in the next step.
• Step 1. Indicator Name and Description: Name and description for each indicator.
• Step 1. Indicator Label: Labels are used to group together benchmark, target and actual indicators. DevTreks recommends using a WBS to classify the indicators.
• Step 1. Target Type: The Benchmark option is used to define a baseline, or benchmark, indicator. The Actual option is used to define the actual results for an indicator. The Full Target and Partial Target options are used to carry out progress and goal-related analyses.
• Step 1. Indicator Alternative: This property is used to compare up to five indicators. Refer to the M and E Analysis references.
• Step 1. Indicator Date: Make sure that the benchmark, targets, actual, indicators have distinct dates.
• Step 1. Indicator Type: If the indicator is a benefit or cost (i.e. substitute inputs), enter the price type. Additional options include demographic, natural resource, and socioeconomic indicator types.
• Step 1. Indicator Weight: A multiplier used in weighted milestone calculations. The Total will be multiplied by this value. Use the description to explain further.
• Step 1. Quantity 1 and 2: Fill in an amount and unit for at least Quantity 1. Fill in Quantity 2 when two quantities are needed to derive a total for the indicator. For example, a substitute input would derive a total cost by including a price for Quantity 1, a quantity for Quantity 2, and a Math Type of Q1_multiply_Q2. A rate can be derived by filling in both Quantities and then specifying Q1_divide_Q2. Use the description field to further explain.
• Step 1. Indicator Total and Unit: The Unit must be manually entered. The Total will be calculated from the Q1Amount, MathType, and Q2Amount properties. For example, a substitute input would derive a total cost by including a price for Quantity 1, a quantity for Quantity 2, and a Math Type of Q1_multiply_Q2.

#### Step 2

• Step 2. Use Same Calculator Pack In Descendants?: True to insert or update this same calculator in children.
• Step 2. Overwrite Descendants?: True to insert or update all of the attributes of this same calculator in all children. False only updates children attributes that are controlled by the developer of this calculator (i.e. version, stylehsheet name, relatedcalculatorstype ...)
• Step 2. What If Tag Name: Instructional videos explaining the use of what-if scenario calculations should be viewed before changing or using this parameter.
• Step 2. Related Calculators Type: When the Use Same Calculator Pack in Descendant is true, uses this value to determine which descendant calculator to update. Inserts a new descendant when no descendant has this same name. Updates the descendant that has this same name.
• Step 2. Indicators: Up to 10 indicators can be included in this step.

#### References

• International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Project/programme monitoring and evaluation (MandE) guide. 2011. (www.ifcr.org)
• International Institute for Educational Planning Manual for Monitoring and Evaluating Education Partnerships. UNESCO 2009. (www.iiep.unesco.org)
• US Government Accountability Office Applied Research and Methods. GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide. Best Practices for Developing and Managing Capital Program Costs. March, 2009.
• United Nations Development Programme Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results. 2009

Current view of document
DevTreks -social budgeting that improves lives and livelihoods
Outcome Group
DRG469- Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity
Outcome
0SR9019- 2007 Replace Hip Joint with Metal Syn Subs, Cem, Open
Indicator Type Target Type Alternative Weight Date Math Type Amount 1 Unit 1 Amount 2 Unit 2
Indicator 1: Full Target Patient Health Status 0SR9019A
Totals: 100.000 score
econ1 fulltarget none 1.000 05/30/2008 none 100.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the full target of a health status index for a hip replacement treatment. The health status index is a weighted average derived from descendant output indicators.
Indicator 2: Q1 Partial Target Patient Health Status 0SR9019A
Totals: 90.000 score
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 08/30/2007 none 90.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the Q1 partial target of a health status index for a hip replacement treatment.
Indicator 3: Q1 Actual Patient Health Status 0SR9019A
Totals: 87.000 score
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 87.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the Q1 actual score for a health status index for a hip replacement treatment.
Output: 2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures
Indicator Type Target Type Alternative Weight Date Math Type Amount 1 Unit 1 Amount 2 Unit 2
Indicator 1: HCAHPS Full Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This one time survey asks patients to answer 27 questions about their satisfaction with the hospital care they received. The threshold established for patient satisfaction is a rating of 75.
Indicator 2: HCAHPSl Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : Since this survey is only taken one time per hospital stay, the benchmark target and the partial target are identical.
Indicator 3: HCAHPS Actual Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 70.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 70.000 rating 0.000
Description : This is a summary of the final score from the patient survey.
Indicator 4: Hip replacement benchmark quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the benchmark score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS). The benchmark reflects the without treatment condition.
Indicator 5: Hip replacement Q1 target quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 90.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 08/29/2007 none 90.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the Q1 target score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Indicator 6: Hip replacement Q1 actual quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 85.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 85.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the actual Q1 score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Output: 2007 OSR9019P2 -Physician-reported quality measures
Indicator Type Target Type Alternative Weight Date Math Type Amount 1 Unit 1 Amount 2 Unit 2
Indicator 1: PQRS Full Target Hospital Stay Days OSR9019P2A
Totals: 3.500 day
econ1 fulltarget none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 3.500 day 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the full target number of hospital stay days for a hip replacement surgery.
Indicator 2: PQRS Partial Target Hospital Stay Days OSR9019P2A
Totals: 3.500 day
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 3.500 day 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the partial target number of hospital stay days for a hip replacement surgery. Because of the short period, the full and partial targets are the same.
Indicator 3: PQRS Actual Hospital Stay Days OSR9019P2A
Totals: 4.000 day
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 4.000 day 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the actual number of hospital stay days for a hip replacement surgery.
Indicator 4: PQRS Full Target Severity of Complications OSR9019P2B
Totals: 10.000 score
none fulltarget none 1.000 11/30/2007 none 10.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the full target severity of complications score for a hip replacement surgery. A 10 score means no complications and a 100 score means death. A minimal acceptable score is a 10 at one year after treatment.
Indicator 5: PQRS Q1 Partial Target Severity of Complications OSR9019P2B
Totals: 15.000 score
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 08/30/2007 none 15.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the partial target severity of complications score for a hip replacement surgery three months after surgery.
Indicator 6: PQRS Q1 Actual Severity of Complications OSR9019P2B
Totals: 17.000 score
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 17.000 score 0.000
Description : This indicator measures the actual severity of complications score for a hip replacement surgery three months after surgery.
This health care treatment is used in a health care analysis tutorial.